Digital vs. Analog Clocks
Educational and medical facilities account for a large percentage of clock system installations. Both system styles are used in these facilities, with selection sometimes being a matter of personal preference and sometimes by design. For instance, K-12 schools may choose analog clocks for their elementary and middle schools as an educational tool. Hospitals may choose analog clocks in some locations for the sweep second hand reference and digital clocks where time recording or timing functions are important.
Many perceive the main benefit of analog clocks to be the graphic display of time. The picture of the clock resides in our brains, making it very easy to order our day. With a simple glance, we can see segments of time that are easily understood references. Analog clocks are also aesthetically pleasing and can add to the décor of any room.
Digital clocks, being numerical rather than pictorial, may not be as readily assimilated for most people. Despite this, digital clocks offer quick and accurate readings, which are essential in time-sensitive industries like the medical field.
They also come with additional features such as countdown timers, alarms, and backlighting for low-light environments. However, some digital clocks can emit blue light, which may be detrimental to sleep.
Perhaps of interesting note, it is said that Albert Einstein refused to have digital clocks in his home and study areas as the representation of time as “static” was wholly inconsistent with his thought process that led to the extraordinary findings of time and motion in his “Special Theory of Relativity” published in 1905.